Regulatory pathway
Current entries are FDA 510(k)-cleared platform families. “Cleared” is not used as a synonym for approved, clinically superior, or proven beneficial.
Methods · version 0.3
This page makes the beta reproducible enough to critique. It is a curated evidence index—not a systematic review, clinical guideline, or product comparison.
01 · Scope
Current entries are FDA 510(k)-cleared platform families. “Cleared” is not used as a synonym for approved, clinically superior, or proven beneficial.
The intended use must include a spine-specific diagnostic, imaging, measurement, planning, navigation, or monitoring function used in a clinical pathway.
The FDA record must explicitly identify AI or machine learning, or describe a trained algorithm under an applicable software classification. Commercial claims alone are insufficient.
Bench-only concepts without a relevant clearance, nonclinical tools, general workflow software, and records with unresolved AI ambiguity are excluded or placed on the watchlist.
02 · Search protocol
FDA 510(k) database and decision summaries; FDA AI-enabled medical-device list; FDA recall database; predicate and reference submissions named in the latest included summary.
PubMed and publisher full text when available; ClinicalTrials.gov for registered studies and current registry status. Manufacturer pages may identify leads but do not establish inclusion or stage.
Trade name, manufacturer, submission number, predecessor names, and core function are combined with terms such as clinical, validation, prospective, reader, workflow, outcome, trial, recall, and software version.
Database inception through August 24, 2026. Searches are English-language and public-record focused. Up to three key studies are displayed when several papers address the same evidence level.
The FDA calls its AI-enabled device list noncomprehensive. At the cutoff used here, the displayed table ended with decision dates through March 30, 2026; absence of a later record from that list is therefore not treated as evidence that the record lacks AI.
03 · Family and version matching
Iterative submissions sharing a trade name and core function are grouped so readers can follow the current record, selected predicates, older studies, and family-level safety signals.
The submission shown in the main table is the latest included FDA record located for that platform family as of the cutoff. Earlier records remain linked when they contain the relevant validation.
The cited regulatory or clinical evidence evaluates the named platform and materially matching function. Direct does not guarantee that a paper reports the exact cleared software version.
A device-family, software-version, workflow, or function mismatch limits transferability. The mismatch is described in the evidence snapshot and must not raise the stage beyond what the matched evidence supports.
04 · Evidence maturity
The displayed stage is the highest evidence type located for the platform family. It does not summarize study quality, comparative effectiveness, safety, or overall product value.
05 · Independence labels
No manufacturer authorship, direct study funding, or disclosed commercial support was located in the displayed evidence.
The record includes both external clinical investigators and a manufacturer relationship, author, funding source, software provision, or institutional collaboration.
The displayed peer-reviewed evidence has manufacturer authorship, funding, or material support without a clearly independent exact-function study.
The stage rests on sponsor-submitted performance information summarized by FDA rather than a peer-reviewed exact- or materially matched clinical paper.
06 · Trials and safety
Each displayed ClinicalTrials.gov record includes its registry status and the date checked. Registered, recruiting, and ongoing are not treated as interchangeable terms.
Searches use the exact submission, trade and family names, manufacturer, and relevant predecessor records. Exact-submission and family-level findings are labeled separately.
This means no FDA recall linked to the displayed submission was found in the documented search as of the cutoff. It does not mean that no adverse events or family-level safety issues exist.
MAUDE reports may identify surveillance signals but cannot establish incidence, causation, or comparative safety and do not determine the evidence stage.
07 · Review and limitations
Each entry receives regulatory, clinical-literature, and editorial consistency checks against linked primary records. The current beta has not undergone independent dual-human systematic-review screening or journal peer review.
Potential omissions remain possible because device names change, publications may not name commercial versions, FDA summaries vary in detail, and paywalled records may restrict full-text inspection. Uncertainty is preserved as a mismatch or watchlist entry rather than filled by inference.
Substantive corrections are dated in the public changelog. Suspected errors should include the device, statement at issue, and a PMID, DOI, FDA submission, recall, or registry record when possible.
Submit a correction →